Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards shopping experience:
1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.
2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about
3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards? Wrong! If the Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.
4. Questions - Got a question about Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....
5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.
6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.
7. Feedback - happy with your Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.
8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site
9. Contact - got a question about Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.
10. Payment - ready to pay for your Convention On The Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.
The
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known as the
New York Convention was adopted by a United Nations diplomatic conference on 10 June
1958 and entered into force on 7 June
1959. The Convention requires courts of contracting states to give effect to agreements to arbitrate and to recognize and enforce arbitration awards made in other contracting states. Widely considered the foundation instrument for international arbitration, it applies to arbitrations which are not considered as domestic awards in the State where recognition and enforcement is sought. Other international conventions apply to the cross border enforcement of arbitration awards, but the New York Convention is by far the most important.
Background
In 1953, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) produced the first draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards to the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). With slight modifications, the ECOSCOC submitted the convention to the Internationl Conference in the Spring of 1958. The Conference was chaired by
Willem Schurmann, the Dutch Permanent Representative to the United Nations and Oscar Schachter, a leading figure in international law who later taught at
Columbia Law School and School of International and Public Affairs, and served as the President of the American Society of International Law.
International arbitration is an increasingly popular means of
alternative dispute resolution for cross-border commercial transactions. The primary advantage of international arbitration over court litigation is enforceability: an international arbitration award is enforceable in most countries in the world. Other advantages of international arbitration include the ability to select a neutral forum to resolve disputes, that arbitration awards are final and not ordinarily subject to appeal, the ability to choose flexible procedures for the arbitration, and confidentiality.
Once a dispute between parties is settled, the winning party needs to collect the award or judgment. Unless the assets of the losing party are located in the country where the court judgment was rendered, the winning party needs to obtain a court judgment in the jurisdiction where the other party resides or where its assets are located. Unless there is a treaty on recognition of court judgments between the country where the judgment is rendered and the country where the winning party seeks to collect, the winning party will be unable to use the court judgment to collect.
Countries which have adopted the New York Convention have agreed to recognize and enforce international arbitration awards. As of September 2007, 141 of the 192
United Nations Member States and the
Holy See have adopted the New York Convention. Only 51 Member States and Taiwan have not yet adopted the New York Convention. A number of
British Dependent Territories have not yet had the Convention extended to them by
Order-in-Council.
Summary of provisions
Under the Convention, an
arbitration award issued in any a contracting state can generally be freely enforced in any other contracting state, only subject to certain, limited defenses. Those defenses are:
a party to the arbitration agreement was, under the law applicable to him, under some Capacity (law);
the arbitration agreement was not valid under its Contract (conflict)#Proper law;
a party was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings, or was otherwise unable to present its case;
the award deals with an issue not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or contains matters beyond the scope of the arbitration (subject to the proviso that an award which contains decisions on such matters may be enforced to the extent that it contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration which can be separated from those matters not so submitted);
the composition of the arbitral tribunal was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties or, failing such agreement, with the law of the place where the hearing took place (the "lex loci arbitri");
the award has not yet become binding upon the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority, either in the country where the arbitration took place, or pursuant to the law of the arbitration agreement;
the subject matter of the award was not capable of resolution by arbitration; or
enforcement would be contrary to "public policy".
Text
The text of the convention is available online.
Parties to the New York Convention
{| class="wikitable"|-! State! Date of Ratification! State! Date of Ratification|-| ||
30 November 2005 ]
2001 [1989 ] 1989 [1989 ] 1997 [1975 ]
1961 [2000 ] 2006 [1988 ] 1992 [1993 ] 1960 [1975 ]
1974 [1995 ] 1993 [1971 ] 2002 [1996 ]
1961 [1987 ] 1960 [1988 ]
1986 [1962 ] 1975 [1987 ]
1979 [1987 ] 1991 [1993 ]
1974 [1980 ] 1993 [1972 ] 1983 [1988 ]
2002 [1962 ]
1959 [1998 ] 1993 [1962 ]
1959 [2006 ] 1994 [1961 ]
1968 [1962 ]
1984 [1991 ]
1983 [1975 ] 2000 [1962 ]
2002 [1960 ]
1981 [2001 ] 1981 [1959 ] 1969 [2002 ]
1961 [1979 ]
1995 [1989 ] 1973 [1978 ] 1996 [1998 ]
1992 [1998 ] 1989 [2005 ] 1995 [1983 ]
1994 [1962 ]
1985 [1994 ]
2000 [2006 ] 1997 [1996 ] 1971 [1998 ] 1982 [1994 ]
2006 [1959 ]
1998 ] 1998 ] 1964 [1983 ]
2003 [1964 ]
1970 [1961 ]
1999 [2005 ]
1984 [1997 ] 1988 [1967 ]
1961 [1994 ]
2002 [1961 ] 1960 [2000 ]
1979 [1994 ] 1994 [2001 ]
1986 [1993 ]
1992 [1976 ] 1977 [1962 ]
1972 [1965 ]
1959 [1964 ]
1959 [1966 ] 1967 [1992 ]
1992 [1960 ]
2006 [1975 ] 1970 [1983 ] 1996 [1995 ]
1995 [2002 ]
1994|}
States which are Not Party to the New York Convention
{| class="wikitable"|-| || || |-| || || || |-| || || , Dem. Republic of the || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || , Fed. States of |||-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |}
External links
- Neil J. Saltzman, The Enforcement of Foreign Awards in New York State
- http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention.html
- http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/ny-convention/parties.html
The
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known as the
New York Convention was adopted by a United Nations diplomatic conference on 10 June
1958 and entered into force on 7 June
1959. The Convention requires courts of contracting states to give effect to agreements to arbitrate and to recognize and enforce arbitration awards made in other contracting states. Widely considered the foundation instrument for international arbitration, it applies to arbitrations which are not considered as domestic awards in the State where recognition and enforcement is sought. Other international conventions apply to the cross border enforcement of arbitration awards, but the New York Convention is by far the most important.
Background
In 1953, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) produced the first draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards to the
United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). With slight modifications, the ECOSCOC submitted the convention to the Internationl Conference in the Spring of 1958. The Conference was chaired by
Willem Schurmann, the Dutch Permanent Representative to the United Nations and
Oscar Schachter, a leading figure in international law who later taught at
Columbia Law School and School of International and Public Affairs, and served as the President of the American Society of International Law.
International arbitration is an increasingly popular means of alternative dispute resolution for cross-border commercial transactions. The primary advantage of international arbitration over court litigation is enforceability: an international arbitration award is enforceable in most countries in the world. Other advantages of international arbitration include the ability to select a neutral forum to resolve disputes, that arbitration awards are final and not ordinarily subject to appeal, the ability to choose flexible procedures for the arbitration, and confidentiality.
Once a dispute between parties is settled, the winning party needs to collect the award or judgment. Unless the assets of the losing party are located in the country where the court judgment was rendered, the winning party needs to obtain a court judgment in the jurisdiction where the other party resides or where its assets are located. Unless there is a treaty on recognition of court judgments between the country where the judgment is rendered and the country where the winning party seeks to collect, the winning party will be unable to use the court judgment to collect.
Countries which have adopted the New York Convention have agreed to recognize and enforce international arbitration awards. As of September 2007, 141 of the 192
United Nations Member States and the Holy See have adopted the New York Convention. Only 51 Member States and
Taiwan have not yet adopted the New York Convention. A number of
British Dependent Territories have not yet had the Convention extended to them by Order-in-Council.
Summary of provisions
Under the Convention, an arbitration award issued in any a contracting state can generally be freely enforced in any other contracting state, only subject to certain, limited defenses. Those defenses are:
a party to the arbitration agreement was, under the law applicable to him, under some Capacity (law);
the arbitration agreement was not valid under its Contract (conflict)#Proper law;
a party was not given proper notice of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings, or was otherwise unable to present its case;
the award deals with an issue not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration, or contains matters beyond the scope of the arbitration (subject to the proviso that an award which contains decisions on such matters may be enforced to the extent that it contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration which can be separated from those matters not so submitted);
the composition of the arbitral tribunal was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties or, failing such agreement, with the law of the place where the hearing took place (the "lex loci arbitri");
the award has not yet become binding upon the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority, either in the country where the arbitration took place, or pursuant to the law of the arbitration agreement;
the subject matter of the award was not capable of resolution by arbitration; or
enforcement would be contrary to "public policy".
Text
The text of the convention is available online.
Parties to the New York Convention
{| class="wikitable"|-! State! Date of Ratification! State! Date of Ratification|-| || 30 November 2005 ]
2001 [1989 ] 1989 [1989 ] 1997 [1975 ]
1961 [2000 ] 2006 [1988 ] 1992 [1993 ]
1960 [1975 ] 1974 [1995 ]
1993 [1971 ] 2002 [1996 ] 1961 [1987 ] 1960 [1988 ] 1986 [1962 ]
1975 [1987 ] 1979 [1987 ]
1991 [1993 ]
1974 [1980 ]
1993 [1972 ] 1983 [1988 ]
2002 [1962 ]
1959 [1998 ] 1993 [1962 ] 1959 [2006 ] 1994 [1961 ]
1968 [1962 ] 1984 [1991 ] 1983 [1975 ] 2000 [1962 ] 2002 [1960 ]
1981 [2001 ] 1981 [1959 ] 1969 [2002 ]
1961 [1979 ]
1995 [1989 ]
1973 [1978 ]
1996 [1998 ] 1992 [1998 ]
1989 [2005 ] 1995 [1983 ] 1994 [1962 ]
1985 [1994 ]
2000 [2006 ] 1997 [1996 ]
1971 [1998 ]
1982 [1994 ] 2006 [1959 ]
1998 ] 1998 ]
1964 [1983 ] 2003 [1964 ]
1970 [1961 ] 1999 [2005 ] 1984 [1997 ] 1988 [1967 ] 1961 [1994 ]
2002 [1961 ] 1960 [2000 ]
1979 [1994 ] 1994 [2001 ] 1986 [1993 ] 1992 [1976 ]
1977 [1962 ] 1972 [1965 ] 1959 [1964 ]
1959 [1966 ] 1967 [1992 ] 1992 [1960 ]
2006 [1975 ]
1970 [1983 ]
1996 [1995 ]
1995 [2002 ] 1994|}
States which are Not Party to the New York Convention
{| class="wikitable"|-| || || |-| || || || |-| || || , Dem. Republic of the || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || , Fed. States of |||-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |-| || || || |}
External links
- Neil J. Saltzman, The Enforcement of Foreign Awards in New York State
- http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/NYConvention.html
- http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/ny-convention/parties.html